Nettsider med emneord «democracy»
The project aims at contributing to our understanding of the democracy concept's structure, and to improve measurement of democracy and its sub-components. Furthermore, the project investigates how democracy, and various constitutional- and other institutional structures, affect economic growth, inequality, conflict and stability of political institutions and regimes.
![Image may contain: Map, World, Ecoregion.](https://www.sv.uio.no/isv/english/research/projects/disentangling-the-economic-effects-deepi/images/regdursquare.png?alt=listing)
This project studies whether and how particular political institutional characteristics – for example concerning the ruling party, election systems, and the protection of civil liberties – affect economic policies and outcomes under different conditions. More specifically, the project analyzes how different institutions, both in democracies and dictatorships, impact on economic growth and redistributive policies, thereby addressing issues of immense importance for the welfare of citizens across the world.
![An old man sitting at a meeting table with a lot of men around him](https://www.sv.uio.no/arena/forskning/aktuelt/aktuelle-saker/2018/bilder/schauble-ep-2017.jpg?alt=listing)
European decision-makers point to flexible relationships with the EU as a way to maintain their countries’ independence and autonomy. New research from ARENA suggests that political differentiation might in fact lead to the opposite, which does not bode well for the UK after Brexit.
![](https://www.sv.uio.no/arena/english/research/projects/recon/LogoRECON-200.jpg?alt=listing)
The RECON-project (Reconstituting Democracy in Europe), concluded on 31 December 2011. The project that was initiated and coordinated by ARENA is now evaluated; mark: Excellent.
![](https://www.sv.uio.no/arena/english/research/publications/2010-2020/publications-2018/eriksen-ejpr-180.jpg?alt=listing)
Erik O. Eriksen analyses the problems that a differentiated European political order poses for self-rule in the article in the European Journal of Political Research.
![EU Parliament members with anti-TTIP signs and T-shirts](https://www.sv.uio.no/arena/english/research/news-and-events/news/2010-2020/2019/images/ep-parliamentarians-2015-ttip.jpg?alt=listing)
Members of the European Parliament have gained great influence in trade policy, thereby challenging the national monopolies of power. Often, they are perceived as a disturbing element in international negotiations.
![A large group of people gathered outside a building.](https://www.sv.uio.no/arena/english/research/news-and-events/news/2010-2020/2019/images/01-eu3d-team.jpg?alt=listing)
The European Union is engaged in a large-scale debate on its future nature and direction. The role and importance of theoretically informed and empirically grounded research in that process is essential, as was made very clear at EU3D's opening conference in Rome.
![](https://www.sv.uio.no/arena/english/research/publications/2010-2020/publications-2018/gruyter-nordic-model-democracy.png?alt=listing)
Several ARENA researchers have contributed with book chapters in a new volume about institutional change in the Nordic model, co-edited by Cathrine Holst.
In spite of relentless criticism over many years bureaucracies and bureaucrats are possibly experiencing a renaissance. The aim of this paper is to make sense of this puzzle by exploring bureaucracy as a specific way of organizing public administration in democratic societies. Through what processes and under what conditions is administrative organization likely to come close to the Weberian ideal type?
ARENA Working Paper 14/2007 (pdf)
Johan P. Olsen
This paper examines challenges and opportunities linked to democratisaton by constitutionalisation, drawing parrallels between the emerging European polity and experience from comparable entities such as Canada.
ARENA Working Paper 10/2006 (pdf)
John Erik Fossum
![stack of newspapers](https://www.sv.uio.no/arena/english/research/projects/reclaim/photo-daniel-r-blume-2054107736_e231ed3572_o.jpg?alt=listing)
RECLAIM studies the challenges of post-factual politics and how they affect democracy in Europe.
The paper is on Robert Alexy’s legal theory and its putative blurring of the distinction between legalization and application.
ARENA Working Paper 07/2004 (pdf)
Erik Oddvar Eriksen
This paper is about the development of an overarching communicative space that functions as a public sphere in Europe.
ARENA Working Paper 03/2004 (pdf)
Erik O. Eriksen
What lessons can be drawn from European integration when it comes to balancing unity and diversity?
ARENA Working Paper 24/2005 (pdf)
Johan P. Olsen
This paper is on whether the parameters of power politics in Europe are changing and whether the EU can be described as a cosmopolitan polity in the making. In other words: Is it the case that the popular sovereignty principe must yield to fundamental human rights?
ARENA Working Paper 09/2005 (pdf)
Erik Oddvar Eriksen
![](https://www.sv.uio.no/arena/english/research/publications/2010-2020/publications-2018/handbook-deliberative-democracy-oxford-handbook.png?alt=listing)
Erik O. Eriksen and John Erik Fossum have contributed with a chapter in the new Oxford Handbook of Deliberative Democracy.
In this paper Cathrine Holst looks at the gender justice in the EU. The paper is a critical discussion of the normative assumptions in the EU gender justice index that is to be launched in the near future.
ARENA Working Paper 22/2008 (pdf)
Cathrine Holst
In this paper, Erik O. Eriksen claims that the EEA Agreement to a large extent has made Norway a de facto EU member. Norway's democratic deficit will increase as the cooperation within the EU expands and the institutions are reformed.
ARENA Working Paper 21/2008 (pdf)
Erik. O. Eriksen