Daniel Naurin

• Stiansen, Øyvind; Naurin, Daniel; Michailidou, Asimina & Riganova, Adriana (2024). Enforcing the rule of law in the EU: effects on public opinion. Journal of European Public Policy. ISSN 1350-1763. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2024.2351989.
• Brekke, Stein Arne; Fjelstul, Joshua C.; Naurin, Daniel & Hermansen, Silje Synnøve Lyder (2023). The CJEU Database Platform: Decisions and Decision-Makers. Journal of Law and Courts. ISSN 2164-6570. 11(2), p. 389–410. doi: 10.1017/jlc.2022.3. Full text in Research Archive
• Boräng, Frida; Naurin, Daniel & Polk, Jonathan (2023). Making space: citizens, parties and interest groups in two ideological dimensions. Journal of European Public Policy. ISSN 1350-1763. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2023.2182819. Full text in Research Archive
• Lindholm, Johan; Derlén, Mattias & Naurin, Daniel (2022). The Ideal Justice: Who Are Selected to Serve and What Does It Say about Swedish High Courts? Tidsskrift for Rettsvitenskap. ISSN 0040-7143. 135(4), p. 397–431. doi: 10.18261/tfr.135.4.1. Full text in Research Archive Show summary

  The Swedish Supreme Court (‘Högsta domstolen’) has existed since 1789 and in 1909 it was joined by the Supreme Administrative Court (‘Högsta förvaltningsdomstolen’). The function and role of the high courts in Swedish society have indisputably varied over time, but the nature and extent of those shifts are underexplored. The paper seeks to describe the high courts’ role over time by studying the professional background of appointed Justices. We argue that the background of those who are selected to serve reflect the prevailing understanding of the proper functioning of the high courts. To achieve this, we cluster all 453 Swedish Justices (1789–2021) based on professional background into six types and study their distribution over time, as well as measure professional diversity. We conclude that the high courts have become more diverse over time: the general mix of backgrounds on the courts have increased and all Justices tend to have a greater range of experiences. Furthermore, the changes in professional background of the Justices indicate greater importance being placed on high-level, technical legal reasoning rather than practical experience of deciding cases. Finally, and perhaps somewhat counterintuitively, the changes in background also indicate a more deferential attitude to the political institutions.

• Šadl, Urška; López-Zurita, Lucía; Brekke, Stein Arne & Naurin, Daniel (2022). Law and orders: the orders of the European Court of Justice as a window in the judicial process and institutional transformations. European Law Open. ISSN 2752-6135. 1(3), p. 549–575. doi: 10.1017/elo.2022.32. Full text in Research Archive Show summary

  Orders are judicial decisions designed to shore up fair and timely resolution of disputes. As written, detailed, and factual documents, they are reliable markers of procedural steps and a unique source of information about the inner working of an institution. This article examines all published orders of the European Court of Justice, drawing lessons from their use. The analysis demonstrates that the pursuit of efficiency and uniform application blurs the lines between the administration and judging. First, it centralises the institution, expanding the duties of the Registry and amplifying the role of the Cabinet of the President of the Court. Second, it bureaucratises the interpretation and the uniform application of European Union law. These processes are common in judicial institutions with no power over their dockets. But the particular European response, authored by the Court, also suggests its reluctance to forfeit the interpretive monopoly.

• Brekke, Stein Arne; Naurin, Daniel; Šadl, Urška & López-Zurita, Lucía (2022). That's an Order! How the Quest for Efficiency Is Transforming Judicial Cooperation in Europe. Journal of Common Market Studies. ISSN 0021-9886. p. 58–75. doi: 10.1111/jcms.13346. Full text in Research Archive
• de Fine Licht, Jenny & Naurin, Daniel (2022). Transparency. In Ansell, Christopher & Torfing, Jacob (Ed.), Handbook on Theories of Governance. Edward Elgar Publishing. ISSN 9781800371965. p. 226–233.
• Huhe, Narisong; Thomson, Robert; Arregui, Javier & Naurin, Daniel (2021). Intergovernmental cooperation networks, national policy positions and partisan ideologies: longitudinal evidence from the Council of the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy. ISSN 1350-1763. 29(1), p. 78–96. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2021.1991980.
• Naurin, Nils Daniel & Boräng, Frida (2021). Political Equality and Substantive Representation by Interest Groups. British Journal of Political Science. ISSN 0007-1234. doi: 10.1017/S0007123421000041.
• Naurin, Nils Daniel & He, Qingqian (2020). 英国脱欧与欧盟理事会权力的再分配 [Brexit and Redistribution of EU Power – A Social Network Analysis Based on Survey Data]. Chinese Journal of European Studies. ISSN 1004-9789. 38(2).
• Hofmann, Andreas & Naurin, Nils Daniel (2020). Explaining interest group litigation in Europe: Evidence from the comparative interest group survey. Governance. An International Journal of Policy, Administration and Institutions. ISSN 0952-1895. doi: 10.1111/gove.12556. Full text in Research Archive Show summary

  Litigation has long been a part of interest groups' lobbying tactics in the U.S. In Europe, by contrast, taking political conflicts to court has traditionally been viewed with skepticism. However, in the wake of an increasing judicialization of politics in Europe, litigation has also become part of the toolbox of European interest groups. Using original survey data from five European countries, we study how they use that tool. We show that European interest groups go to court somewhat less often than their American counterparts, but that the groups that do end up in court have similar characteristics. Overall, we find that the more politically active and resourceful a group is, the more likely it is to turn to the courts. However, a subset of politically active groups, one that deploys distinct outsider tactics, is more likely to use litigation than the rest. Government funding, however, reduces groups' propensity to litigate.

• Stiansen, Øyvind; Naurin, Nils Daniel & Bøyum, Live Standal (2020). Law and Politics in the Inter-American Court of Human Rights. A New Database on Judicial Behavior and Compliance in the IACtHR. Journal of Law and Courts. ISSN 2164-6570. 8(2), p. 359–379. doi: 10.1086/709914. Full text in Research Archive
• Derlén, Mattias; Lindholm, Johan & Naurin, Nils Daniel (2019). You’re Gonna Miss Me When I’m Gone! The Impact of Brexit on Member States’ Contribution to the Case Law of the CJEU. Europarättslig tidskrift. ISSN 1403-8722. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3427960.
• Naurin, Nils Daniel; Naurin, Elin & Alexander, Amy (2019). Gender stereotyping and chivalry in international negotiations. A survey experiment in the Council of the European Union. International Organization. ISSN 0020-8183. doi: 10.1017/s0020818319000043. Full text in Research Archive
• Huhe, Narisong; Naurin, Nils Daniel & Thomson, Robert (2019). Don’t cry for me Britannia: The resilience of the European Union to Brexit. European Union Politics. ISSN 1465-1165. doi: 10.1177/1465116519882096. Full text in Research Archive Show summary

  We assess the impact of the United Kingdom’s 2016 decision to leave the European Union on the Council of the European Union, where Brexit is likely to have the clearest observable implications. Using concepts and models from the spatial model of politics and network analysis, we formulate and test expectations regarding the effects of Brexit. We examine two of the most prominent datasets on recent decision-making in the European Union, which include data on cooperation networks among member states before and after the 2016 referendum. Our findings identify some of the political challenges that Brexit will bring, but also highlight the factors that are already helping the European Union’s remaining member states to adapt to Brexit.

• Olof, Larsson & Naurin, Nils Daniel (2019). Split Vision. Multidimensionality in the European Union’s Legal Policy Space. International Studies Quarterly. ISSN 0020-8833.
• Naurin, Nils Daniel & Stiansen, Øyvind (2019). The Dilemma of Dissent: Split Judicial Decisions and Compliance With Judgments From the International Human Rights Judiciary. Comparative Political Studies. ISSN 0010-4140. 53(6), p. 959–991. doi: 10.1177/0010414019879944. Full text in Research Archive
• Naurin, Nils Daniel & Reh, Christine (2018). Deliberative Negotiation. In Bächtiger, André; Dryzek, John S.; Mansbridge, Jane & Warren, Mark E. (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Deliberative Democracy. Oxford University Press. ISSN 9780198747369. doi: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198747369.013.52.
• Naurin, Nils Daniel (2018). Liberal Intergovernmentalism in the Councils of the EU: A Baseline Theory? Journal of Common Market Studies. ISSN 0021-9886. 56(7), p. 1526–1543. doi: 10.1111/jcms.12786. Full text in Research Archive
• Naurin, Nils Daniel & Naurin, Elin (2017). Descriptive Representation and Negotiation: Gender Balance in the Committees of the Council of the European Union. In Aggestam, Karin & Towns, Ann (Ed.), Gendering diplomacy and international negotiation. Palgrave Macmillan. ISSN 978-3-319-58681-6. p. 213–237. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-58682-3.
• Naurin, Nils Daniel; Huhe, Narisong & Thomson, Robert (2017). With or without you? Policy impact and networks in the Council of the EU after Brexit. European Policy Analysis. ISSN 2380-6567. Full text in Research Archive
• Naurin, Nils Daniel (2017). The Puzzle of Transparency Reforms in the Council of the EU. Politics and Governance. ISSN 2183-2463. 5(3), p. 87–90. doi: 10.17645/pag.v5i3.941. Full text in Research Archive
• Huhe, Narisong; Naurin, Nils Daniel & Thomson, Robert (2017). The Evolution of Political Networks: Evidence from the Council of the European Union. European Union Politics. ISSN 1465-1165. 19(1), p. 25–51. doi: 10.1177/1465116517740228.
• Naurin, Nils Daniel & Julian, Dederke (2017). Friends of the Court? Why EU governments file observations before the Court of Justice. European Journal of Political Research. ISSN 0304-4130. doi: 10.1111/1475-6765.12255. Full text in Research Archive
• Larsson, Olof; Naurin, Daniel; Derlén, Mattias & Lindholm, Johan (2017). Speaking Law to Power: The Strategic Use of Precedent of the Court of Justice of the European Union. Comparative Political Studies. ISSN 0010-4140. 50(7), p. 879–907. doi: 10.1177/0010414016639709.
• de Fine Licht, Jenny & Naurin, Daniel (2016). Transparency. In Ansell, Christopher & Torfing, Jacob (Ed.), Handbook on Theories of Governance. Edward Elgar Publishing. ISSN 9781782548492.
• Larsson, Olof & Naurin, Daniel (2016). Judicial Independence and Political Uncertainty: How the Risk of Override Affects the Court of Justice of the EU. International Organization. ISSN 0020-8183. 70(2), p. 377–408. doi: 10.1017/S0020818316000047.

View all works in Cristin

• Naurin, Nils Daniel (2020). The CJEU Database Project.
• Naurin, Nils Daniel & Holmgren, Mikael (2020). Mirroring Politics In International Courts.
• Siv, Cheruvu; Naurin, Nils Daniel & Hermansen, Silje Synnøve Lyder (2019). Does Merit Selection Matter for Judicial Performance? Evidence from the Court of Justice of the European Union.
• Naurin, Nils Daniel & Holmgren, Mikael (2019). Justice Delayed: How Ideological Conflict Affects the Court of Justice of the EU? .
• Naurin, Nils Daniel & Hermansen, Silje Synnøve Lyder (2018). Will Do? Selecting Judges on the Basis of Policy Preferences or Performance Indicators.
• Naurin, Nils Daniel; Polk, Jonathan & Boräng, Frida (2018). Making Space. A Cross-country Comparison of Parties and Interest Groups Positioning in Multiple Policy Dimensions.
• Naurin, Nils Daniel & Larsson, Olof (2018). Appointments of Judges and Judicial Behavior in the Court of Justice of the European Union.
• Naurin, Nils Daniel; Huhe, Narisong & Thomson, Robert (2017). Decision-Making and Networks in the Council of the European Union after Brexit.
• Naurin, Nils Daniel & Stiansen, Øyvind (2017). Judicial Dissent and Compliance with the Inter-American Court of Human Rights.
• Naurin, Nils Daniel & Stiansen, Øyvind (2017). Judicial Dissent and Compliance with the Inter-American Court of Human Rights.
• Naurin, Nils Daniel & Stiansen, Øyvind (2017). Judicial Dissent and Compliance with the Inter-American Court of Human Rights.
• Naurin, Nils Daniel; Langford, Malcolm & Vibe, Vegard Furustøl (2017). A Different Voice In International Courts? Gender and Judicial Behavior In Sexual And Reproductive Rights.
• Naurin, Nils Daniel & Larsson, Olof (2017). Split Vision. Multi-Dimensionality in the International Legal Policy Space.
• Naurin, Nils Daniel; Boräng, Frida & Polk, Jonathan (2017). Making Space. A Cross-country Comparison of Parties and Interest Groups Positioning in Multiple Policy Dimensions.
• Naurin, Nils Daniel & Larsson, Olof (2017). The Effect of Political Preferences among CJEU Judges and their Appointing Governments.
• Naurin, Nils Daniel; Huhe, Narisong & Thomson, Robert (2017). Decision-Making and Networks in the Council of the European Union after Brexit.
• Naurin, Nils Daniel & Hofmann, Andreas (2017). When do Interest Groups go to Court? Evidence from a Cross-National Survey.
• Naurin, Nils Daniel (2017). Gender on the Bench.
• Naurin, Nils Daniel (2017). Global and Regional Governance workshop.
• Naurin, Nils Daniel (2017). Hur mår EU?
• Naurin, Daniel & Larsson, Olof (2016). Split Vision. Multi-Dimensionality in the International Legal Policy Space.
• Naurin, Daniel; Naurin, Elin & Alexander, Amy (2016). Gender stereotyping and chivalry in international negotiations. A survey experiment in the Council of the European Union.
• Naurin, Daniel & Dederke, Julian (2016). Friends of the Court? Why EU governments file observations before the Court of Justice.
• Naurin, Daniel & Boräng, Frida (2016). Lobbying for the people? Measuring substantive representation by interest groups.
• Naurin, Daniel & Stiansen, Øyvind (2016). Judicial Dissent and Compliance with Inter-American Court of Human Rights Judgments.
• Johansson, Markus; Larsson, Olof; Lindahl, Rutger & Naurin, Daniel (2023). Cooperation in the Council of the EU: Explaining network relations among member states. SIEPS.
• Johansson, Markus; Naurin, Nils Daniel & Lindahl, Rutger (2019). Samarbete och inflytande i EU:s ministerråd. SIEPS.
• Cramér, Per; Larsson, Olof; Moberg, Andreas & Naurin, Daniel (2016). See You in Luxembourg? EU Governments´ Observations Under the Preliminary Reference Procedure. The Swedish Institute for European Policy. ISSN 978-91-86107-62-8.

View all works in Cristin