Peace on quicksand? Challenging the conventional wisdom about economic growth and post-conflict risks

Published in

Journal of Peace Research 49 (3), forthcoming in 2012

Abstract

In a widely cited study, Collier, Hoeffler & Söderbom (2008) show that economic growth reduces the risk of post-conflict peace collapse – particularly when the UN is present with a peace mission. These findings are encouraging for interventionist international policy makers. We replicate their study using data from the UCDP/PRIO Armed Conflict Database instead of the Correlates of War database. We generate a series of different datasets on the basis of different coding criteria commonly used in the literature, and rerun a simplified version of their model. Surprisingly, our results do not support their findings regarding the risk-reducing effect of economic growth and UN involvement. At best, the results are mixed. Some of the models even suggest that economic growth may increase the risk of post-conflict peace collapse. Overall, we are forced to conclude that the impact of economic growth and UN involvement on the risk of post-conflict peace collapse may not be clear and simple. The differences in the results seem to be driven by two sources: the conflicts included in the original datasets and the coding of the start and end dates of the conflicts.

Full text (.pdf)

By Marianne Dahl and Bjørn Høyland
Published Feb. 27, 2012 1:08 PM - Last modified Nov. 20, 2017 2:35 PM