HGO4202 H20 Urbanism - urban policies and planning

MARKET-ORIENTED MODES OF GOVERNANCE

1. 	Brenner N, Peck J, Theodore N. Variegated neoliberalization: geographies, modalities, pathways. Global Networks. 2010;10(2):182–222. doi:10.1111/j.1471-0374.2009.00277.x

2. 	Pinson G, Morel Journel C. The Neoliberal City - Theory, Evidence, Debates. Territory, Politics, Governance: The Neoliberal City: Theory, Evidence, Debates. 2016;4(2):137–153. doi:10.1080/21622671.2016.1166982

3. 	Storper M. Governing the Large Metropolis. Territory, Politics, Governance. 2014;2(2):115–134. doi:10.1080/21622671.2014.919874

4. 	Storper M. The Neo-liberal City as Idea and Reality. Territory, Politics, Governance: The Neoliberal City: Theory, Evidence, Debates. 2016;4(2):241–263. doi:10.1080/21622671.2016.1158662

5. 	Gómez MV. Reflective images: the case of urban regeneration in Glasgow and Bilbao. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research. 1998;22(1):106–121. doi:10.1111/1468-2427.00126

6. 	Gomez M, Gonzalez S. A reply to Beatriz Plaza’s «The Guggenheim-Bilbao Museum effect». International Journal Of Urban And Regional Research. 2001;25(4):898–900.

7. 	González S. Bilbao and Barcelona «in Motion». How Urban Regeneration «Models» Travel and Mutate in the Global Flows of Policy Tourism. Urban Studies. 2011;48(7):1397–1418. doi:10.1177/0042098010374510

8. 	Plaza B. The Guggenheim-Bilbao Museum Effect: A Reply to Maria V. Gomez’ `Reflective Images: The Case of Urban Regeneration in Glasgow and Bilbao’.(Statistical Data Included). International Journal of Urban and Regional Research. 1999;23(3):589–592.

9. 	Plaza B, Haarich S. The Guggenheim Museum Bilbao: Between Regional Embeddedness and Global Networking. European Planning Studies. 2015;23(8):1456–1475. doi:10.1080/09654313.2013.817543

URBAN PLANNING AND ARCHITECTURE

10. 	Grubbauer M. Architecture, Economic Imaginaries and Urban Politics: The Office Tower as Socially Classifying Device. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research. 2014;38(1):336–359. doi:10.1111/1468-2427.12110

11. 	Davidson, M. and Lees, L. (2010). New-Build Gentrification: Its Histories, Trajectories, and Critical Geographies Population, Space and Place16, 395–411.

11. 	Loretta Lees. Towards a critical geography of architecture: the case of an ersatz Colosseum. Ecumene (Sevenoaks, England). 2001;8(1):51–86. doi:10.1177/096746080100800103

12. 	Kaika M. Architecture and crisis: re-inventing the icon, re-imag(in)ing London and re-branding the City. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers. 2010;35(4):453–474. doi:10.1111/j.1475-5661.2010.00398.x

13. 	Kraftl P. Geographies of Architecture: The Multiple Lives of Buildings. Geography Compass. 2010;4(5):402–415. doi:10.1111/j.1749-8198.2010.00332.x

14. 	Jones P. Putting Architecture in its Social Place: A Cultural Political Economy of Architecture. Imrie R (Editor), Street E (Editor), red. Urban Studies. 2009;46(12):2519–2536. doi:10.1177/0042098009344230

PLANNING AND POLICIES FOR SUBURBAN SPACES

15. 	Chaves E. The restless landscape of metroburbia. I: Wu F, Phelps NA, red. International perspectives on suburbanization : a post-suburban world? Palgrave Macmillan; Palgrave Macmillan; 2011:35–53.

Filion, P. and Keil, R. (2016). Contested Infrastructures: Tension, Inequity and Innovation in the Global Suburb. Urban Policy and Research,35(1), 7-19.

Hochstenbach, C. and Musterd, S. (2017). Gentrification and the suburbanization of poverty: changing urban geographies through boom and bust periods. Urban Geography, 9(1), 26-53.

16. 	Keil R. Suburbanization Explained. I: Suburban planet : making the world urban from the outside in. Polity Press; 2018:23–40.

17. 	Lupi T, Musterd S. The suburban «community question». Urban Studies. 2006;43(4):801–817. doi:10.1080/00420980600597723

18. 	Nüssli R, Schmid C. Beyond the Urban–Suburban Divide: Urbanization and the Production of the Urban in Zurich North. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research. 2016;40(3):679–701. doi:10.1111/1468-2427.12390

19. 	Phelps NA, Wood AM. The New Post-suburban Politics? Macleod G (Editor), Jones M (Editor), red. Urban Studies. 2011;48(12):2591–2610. doi:10.1177/0042098011411944

HOUSING POLICY AND HOUSING REGIMES

20. 	Bengtsson B, Sørvoll J. Home ownership, housing policy and path dependence in Finland, Norway and Sweden. I: Caroline Dewilde (Editor), Richard Ronald (Editor), red. Housing Wealth and Welfare. Edward Elgar Publishing; 2017:1–270. doi:10.4337/9781785360961

21. 	Dewilde C. Do housing regimes matter? Assessing the concept of housing regimes through configurations of housing outcomes. International Journal of Social Welfare. 2017;26(4):384–404. doi:10.1111/ijsw.12261

22. 	Kemeny J. Corporatism and Housing Regimes. Housing, Theory and Society. 2006;23(1):1–18. doi:10.1080/14036090500375423

23. 	Tranøy BS, Stamsø MA, Hjertaker I. Equality as a driver of inequality? Universalistic welfare, generalised creditworthiness and financialised housing markets. West European Politics: Bricks in the Wall: The Politics of Housing in Europe. 2020;43(2):390–411. doi:10.1080/01402382.2019.1612161

AREA-BASED POLICIES

24. 	Andersson R, Musterd S. Area-based policies: A critical appraisal. Tijdschrift Voor Economische En Sociale Geografie. 2005;96(4):377–389.

25. 	Andersson R, Bråmå Å, Holmqvist E. Counteracting Segregation: Swedish Policies and Experiences. Housing Studies: Housing Policy and (De)Segregation: An International Perspective. 2010;25(2):237–256. doi:10.1080/02673030903561859.

26. 	Galster G. Neighborhood Social Mix: Theory, Evidence, and Implications for Policy and Planning. I: Fainstein SS, Carmon N, red. Policy, planning, and people : promoting justice in urban development. 1st ed. University of Pennsylvania Press; 2013:307–336.

27. 	Lawless P. Area-based urban interventions: Rationale and outcomes: The new deal for communities programme in England. Urban Studies. 2006;43(11):1991–2011. doi:10.1080/00420980600897859.

27. Agger, A., Jensen, O.J. Area-based Initiatives and their Work in Bonding, Bridging and Linking Social Capital. European Planning Studies. 2015; 23(19): 2045-2061. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2014.998172.

28. 	Lees L. Gentrification and Social Mixing: Towards an Inclusive Urban Renaissance? Urban Studies. 2008;45(12):2449–2470. doi:10.1177/0042098008097099

Urban policies and urban transitions in Central and Eastern Europe

29. 	Sjöberg Ö. Cases on to Themselves? Theory and Research on Ex-socialist Urban Environments. Geografie. 2014;119:299–319. https://geografie.cz/119/4/0299/

30. 	Gentile M, Sjöberg Ö. Housing allocation under socialism: the Soviet case revisited. Post-Soviet Affairs. 2013;29(2):173–195. doi:10.1080/1060586X.2013.782685

31. 	Sýkora L, Bouzarovski S. Multiple Transformations: Conceptualising the Post-communist Urban Transition. Urban Studies. 2012;49(1):43–60. doi:10.1177/0042098010397402

32. 	Kuzio T. Transition in Post-Communist States: Triple or Quadruple? Kuzio T (correspondence author), red. Politics. 2001;21(3):168–177.

PLANNING, DEMOCRACY AND JUSTICE

33. 	Arnstein SR. A Ladder Of Citizen Participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners. 1969;35(4):216–224. doi:10.1080/01944366908977225

34. 	Checker M. Wiped Out by the “Greenwave”: Environmental Gentrification and the Paradoxical Politics of Urban Sustainability. City & Society. 2011;23(2):210–229. doi:10.1111/j.1548-744X.2011.01063.x

35. 	Amin A and T. The Democratic City: I: Thrift N, red. Cities : reimagining the urban. Polity; 2002:VI, 184 s.

Cardullo, P., Kitchin, R. and Feliciantonio, C. D. (2018) Living labs and vacancy in the neoliberal city. Cities, 73, 44-50.

36. 	Fainstein SS. New Directions in Planning Theory. Urban Affairs Review. 2000;35(4):451–478. doi:10.1177/107808740003500401

37. 	Healey P. On creating the «city» as a collective resource. Urban Studies. 2002;39(10):1777–1792. doi:10.1080/0042098022000002957

38. 	Hudson BM, Galloway TD, Kaufman JL. Comparison of Current Planning Theories: Counterparts and Contradictions. Journal of the American Planning Association. 1979;45(4):387–398. doi:10.1080/01944367908976980

39. 	Innes JE, Booher DE. Reframing public participation: strategies for the 21st century. Planning Theory & Practice. 2004;5(4):419–436. doi:10.1080/1464935042000293170

40. 	Lane MB. Public Participation in Planning: an intellectual history. Australian Geographer. 2005;36(3):283–299. doi:10.1080/00049180500325694