Eva Erman - The Proper Place of Epistemic Norms in Political Theory

Abstract: One recent debate in political theory centers on the question of whether there is a distinctively political normativity. According to an influential view, there is a distinctive set of norms that applies specifically to political actions and decisions, which are not grounded in moral normativity. On one version of this non-moral view, political theory is grounded in epistemic normativity (and thus epistemic norms). Theorists identifying as ‘radical realists’ insist that political theorists do not need any moral normativity (and thus moral norms), because epistemic normativity provides sufficient action-guidance for political theory. In this paper, we take our point of departure in a critical analysis of this epistemic version of the non-moral view, with the overall aim of analyzing the importance and limitation of epistemic norms in political theory. We argue that epistemic norms are necessary – since a political theory should not rely on empirical falsities – but not sufficient for a successful account in the political domain. Two claims are made: moral norms are essential in the process of political theorizing, both in the form of pre-epistemic norms and in the form of post-epistemic norms. More specifically, we contend, first, that we need moral norms to identify and justify which practices to study when conducting ideology critique, and second, that we need moral norms to tell us how to act in light of our investigation of warranted and unwarranted beliefs.